Xeon Phi 7290 vs Athlon 800
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 800 and Xeon Phi 7290 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Architecture codename | Thunderbird (1999−2000) | Knights Landing (2016) |
| Release date | 20 December 1999 (25 years ago) | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 800 and Xeon Phi 7290 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 72 (Doheptaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 288 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.8 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 32 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 102 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 70 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 22 million | 8,000 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 800 and Xeon Phi 7290 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | A | 3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 43 Watt | 245 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 800 and Xeon Phi 7290. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Athlon 800 and Xeon Phi 7290 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 800 and Xeon Phi 7290 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 800 and Xeon Phi 7290. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 December 1999 | 20 June 2016 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 72 |
| Threads | 1 | 288 |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 43 Watt | 245 Watt |
Athlon 800 has 469.8% lower power consumption.
Xeon Phi 7290, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, 7100% more physical cores and 28700% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 800 and Xeon Phi 7290. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 800 is a desktop processor while Xeon Phi 7290 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 800 and Xeon Phi 7290, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
