Celeron N2810 vs Athlon 64 X2 TK-55

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.33
+37.5%
Celeron N2810
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.24

Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 outperforms Celeron N2810 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Celeron N2810 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30893180
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x Athlon 64Intel Celeron
Power efficiency1.013.24
Architecture codenameTaylor / Hawk-256Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release dateno data11 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$260

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Celeron N2810 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Celeron N2810 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Celeron N2810. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Celeron N2810 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Celeron N2810 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Celeron N2810. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Graphics max frequencyno data756 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Celeron N2810 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Celeron N2810.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 0.33
+37.5%
Celeron N2810 0.24

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 518
+37.4%
Celeron N2810 377

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 1316
+26.2%
Celeron N2810 1043

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 0.24
Chip lithography 65 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 7 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 has a 37.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron N2810, on the other hand, has a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 342.9% lower power consumption.

The Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2810 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Celeron N2810, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
Intel Celeron N2810
Celeron N2810

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 27 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 41 vote

Rate Celeron N2810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 or Celeron N2810, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.