Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Athlon 64 X2 6000+

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 X2 6000+
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 125 Watt
0.59
Ryzen 7 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
18.20
+2985%

Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Athlon 64 X2 6000+ by a whopping 2985% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Ryzen 7 7840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2802327
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency0.4549.21
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release dateAugust 2007 (17 years ago)January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Ryzen 7 7840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512K1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm4 nm
Die size220 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors227 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Ryzen 7 7840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2FP8
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Ryzen 7 7840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataRyzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Ryzen 7 7840HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Ryzen 7 7840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Ryzen 7 7840HS.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 0.59
Ryzen 7 7840HS 18.20
+2985%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 930
Ryzen 7 7840HS 28902
+3008%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 241
Ryzen 7 7840HS 2366
+882%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 419
Ryzen 7 7840HS 11004
+2526%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.59 18.20
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 90 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 7 7840HS has a 2984.7% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 2150% more advanced lithography process, and 257.1% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 7840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 7840HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Ryzen 7 7840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
Ryzen 7 7840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 313 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1636 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 6000+ or Ryzen 7 7840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.