Celeron 847 vs Athlon 64 X2 3800+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Athlon 64 X2 3600+ Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Athlon 64 X2 4000+ Athlon 64 X2 4200+ Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Athlon 64 X2 5200+ Athlon 64 X2 5400+ Athlon 64 X2 5600+ Athlon 64 X2 5800+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+ Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Core i5-2410M Core i5-2450M Core i7-2630QM Core i7-2670QM

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 X2 3800+
2005
2 cores / 2 threads, 89 Watt
0.40
+33.3%
Celeron 847
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.30

Athlon 64 X2 3800+ outperforms Celeron 847 by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Athlon 64 X2 3800+
Celeron 847 Celeron 847

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and Celeron 847 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30133113
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency0.431.67
Architecture codenameManchester (2005−2006)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release dateAugust 2005 (19 years ago)19 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$134

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and Celeron 847 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data11
L1 cache256K64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm32 nm
Die size220 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors154 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and Celeron 847 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket939FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and Celeron 847. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and Celeron 847 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and Celeron 847 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and Celeron 847. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 800 MHz)
Graphics max frequencyno data800 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and Celeron 847 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and Celeron 847.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 X2 3800+ 0.40
+33.3%
Celeron 847 0.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 3800+ 629
+31.3%
Celeron 847 479

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon 64 X2 3800+ 203
+31%
Celeron 847 155

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon 64 X2 3800+ 376
+43%
Celeron 847 263

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.40 0.30
Chip lithography 90 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 17 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 3800+ has a 33.3% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron 847, on the other hand, has a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 423.5% lower power consumption.

The Athlon 64 X2 3800+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 847 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 X2 3800+ is a desktop processor while Celeron 847 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 3800+ and Celeron 847, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
Intel Celeron 847
Celeron 847
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Athlon 64 X2 3800+
vs
Athlon 64 3800+ Athlon 64 3800+
Celeron 847 Celeron 847
vs
Celeron 925 Celeron 925
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Athlon 64 X2 3800+
vs
Athlon 64 X2 3600+ Athlon 64 X2 3600+
Athlon 64 X2 3600+ Athlon 64 X2 3600+
vs
Xeon Bronze 3508U Xeon Bronze 3508U
Athlon 64 X2 3600+ Athlon 64 X2 3600+
vs
i3-14100T Core i3 14100T
Athlon 64 X2 3600+ EE Athlon 64 X2 3600+ EE
vs
Ryzen 9 9950X Ryzen 9 9950X
Athlon 64 X2 3600+ EE Athlon 64 X2 3600+ EE
vs
Ultra 5 245KF Core Ultra 5 245KF
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Athlon 64 X2 3800+
vs
E2-3000 E2 3000
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Athlon 64 X2 3800+
vs
Athlon 64 LE-1600 Athlon 64 LE-1600
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Athlon 64 X2 3800+
vs
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ EE Athlon 64 X2 3800+ EE
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Athlon 64 X2 3800+
vs
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Athlon 64 X2 3800+
vs
Sempron 2300+ Sempron 2300+

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 94 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 389 votes

Rate Celeron 847 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 3800+ or Celeron 847, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.