Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U vs Athlon 64 TF-20
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U outperforms Athlon 64 TF-20 by a whopping 9325% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 TF-20 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3280 | 462 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Athlon 64 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.61 | 50.97 |
| Architecture codename | Sherman (2009) | Hawk Point (2024) |
| Release date | 1 May 2009 (15 years ago) | 16 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 TF-20 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 0.1 MB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 25,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 TF-20 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | S1g1 | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 780M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.16 | 15.08 |
| Recency | 1 May 2009 | 16 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 28 Watt |
Athlon 64 TF-20 has 12% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, on the other hand, has a 9325% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 TF-20 in performance tests.
Be aware that Athlon 64 TF-20 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 TF-20 and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
