E1-6010 vs Athlon 64 TF-20

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 TF-20 and E1-6010 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon 64AMD E-Series
Architecture codenameSherman (2009)Beema (2014)
Release date1 May 2009 (15 years ago)29 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Current price$4.99 $314

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 TF-20 and E1-6010 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.35 GHz
Bus support667 MHzno data
L1 cache0.1 MBno data
L2 cache512 KB1024 KB
Chip lithography65 nm28 nm
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 TF-20 and E1-6010 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1g1FT3b
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and E1-6010. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, Single-Channel DDR3L-1333
AES-NIno data+
FMAno dataFMA4
AVXno data+
PowerTuneno data-
TrueAudiono data-
PowerNowno data+
PowerGatingno data+
Out-of-band client managementno data-
VirusProtect++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and E1-6010 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data1
IOMMU 2.0no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and E1-6010. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Endurono data+
Switchable graphicsno data1
UVDno data+
VCEno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 64 TF-20 and E1-6010 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and E1-6010 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkanno data1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and E1-6010.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Athlon 64 TF-20 1245
+23.8%
E1-6010 1006

Athlon 64 TF-20 outperforms E1-6010 by 24% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Athlon 64 TF-20 612
E1-6010 927
+51.5%

E1-6010 outperforms Athlon 64 TF-20 by 51% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2009 29 April 2014
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 10 Watt

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 TF-20 and E1-6010. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 TF-20 and E1-6010, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 TF-20
Athlon 64 TF-20
AMD E1-6010
E1-6010

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 33 votes

Rate Athlon 64 TF-20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 522 votes

Rate E1-6010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 TF-20 or E1-6010, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.