E1-2100 vs Athlon 64 TF-20

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 TF-20
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.16
E1-2100
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 9 Watt
0.26
+62.5%

E1-2100 outperforms Athlon 64 TF-20 by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 TF-20 and E1-2100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33003157
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon 64AMD E-Series
Power efficiency0.612.73
Architecture codenameSherman (2009)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date1 May 2009 (15 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 TF-20 and E1-2100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cache0.1 MBno data
L2 cache512 KB1024 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 TF-20 and E1-2100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1g1FT3
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and E1-2100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus ProtectionMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, BMI1, ABM, SVM, AES-NI
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and E1-2100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and E1-2100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8210
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 64 TF-20 and E1-2100 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and E1-2100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and E1-2100.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 TF-20 0.16
E1-2100 0.26
+62.5%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Athlon 64 TF-20 1245
+62.7%
E1-2100 765

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon 64 TF-20 612
E1-2100 772
+26.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 0.26
Recency 1 May 2009 23 May 2013
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 9 Watt

E1-2100 has a 62.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 177.8% lower power consumption.

The E1-2100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 TF-20 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 TF-20 and E1-2100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 TF-20
Athlon 64 TF-20
AMD E1-2100
E1-2100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 34 votes

Rate Athlon 64 TF-20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 321 vote

Rate E1-2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 TF-20 or E1-2100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.