Celeron N3050 vs Athlon 64 TF-20

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Athlon 64 L110 Athlon 64 TF-20 Athlon 64 X2 TK-42 Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 Athlon 64 X2 TK-57
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Celeron N3050 Celeron N3060 Pentium N3700 Pentium N3710

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 TF-20
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.16
Celeron N3050
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.37
+131%

Celeron N3050 outperforms Athlon 64 TF-20 by a whopping 131% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Athlon 64 TF-20 Athlon 64 TF-20
Celeron N3050 Celeron N3050

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron N3050 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33003041
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon 64Intel Celeron
Power efficiency0.615.83
Architecture codenameSherman (2009)Braswell (2015−2016)
Release date1 May 2009 (15 years ago)1 April 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron N3050 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz2.16 GHz
Bus typeno dataIDI
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cache0.1 MBno data
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature95 °C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron N3050 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketS1g1FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron N3050. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protectionno data
AES-NI-+
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron N3050 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron N3050 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron N3050. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for Intel Celeron Processor N3000 Series
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data600 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron N3050 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron N3050 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron N3050.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 TF-20 0.16
Celeron N3050 0.37
+131%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Athlon 64 TF-20 1245
+13.3%
Celeron N3050 1099

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon 64 TF-20 612
Celeron N3050 1243
+103%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.16 0.37
Recency 1 May 2009 1 April 2015
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron N3050 has a 131.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N3050 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 TF-20 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 TF-20 and Celeron N3050, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

AMD Athlon 64 TF-20
Athlon 64 TF-20
Intel Celeron N3050
Celeron N3050
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Athlon 64 TF-20 Athlon 64 TF-20
vs
Pentium M 758 Pentium M 758
Celeron N3050 Celeron N3050
vs
Core 2 Duo T5450 Core 2 Duo T5450
Athlon 64 TF-20 Athlon 64 TF-20
vs
Pentium M 715 Pentium M 715
Pentium M 725 Pentium M 725
vs
i3-N305 Core i3 N305
Pentium M 725 Pentium M 725
vs
Processor N95 Processor N95
Atom N550 Atom N550
vs
i7-12700H Core i7 12700H
Atom N550 Atom N550
vs
Ryzen 9 7845HX Ryzen 9 7845HX
Athlon 64 TF-20 Athlon 64 TF-20
vs
Pentium N3540 Pentium N3540
Athlon 64 TF-20 Athlon 64 TF-20
vs
E1-2100 E1 2100
Athlon 64 TF-20 Athlon 64 TF-20
vs
i7-11700 Core i7 11700
Athlon 64 TF-20 Athlon 64 TF-20
vs
i9-11900T Core i9 11900T
Athlon 64 TF-20 Athlon 64 TF-20
vs
Xeon w5-3435X Xeon w5 3435X
Athlon 64 TF-20 Athlon 64 TF-20
vs
Ryzen 3 7440U Ryzen 3 7440U

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 34 votes

Rate Athlon 64 TF-20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 552 votes

Rate Celeron N3050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 TF-20 or Celeron N3050, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.