Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 vs Athlon 64 TF-20
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 TF-20 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Athlon 64 | 2x Athlon 64 |
| Architecture codename | Sherman (2009) | Taylor / Hawk-256 |
| Release date | 1 May 2009 (15 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 TF-20 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | 667 MHz |
| L1 cache | 0.1 MB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 TF-20 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1g1 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 31 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 31 Watt |
Athlon 64 TF-20 has 24% lower power consumption.
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 TF-20 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 TF-20 and Athlon 64 X2 TK-55, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
