Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Athlon 64 FX-62
Aggregated performance score
Athlon 64 FX-62 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5000+ by 28% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
Comparing Athlon 64 FX-62 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2634 | 2744 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation | 2.24 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | Athlon 64 (Desktop) | no data |
| Architecture codename | Windsor (2006−2009) | Windsor (2006−2009) |
| Release date | no data | May 2006 (18 years ago) |
| Current price | $28 | $89 |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed Specifications
Athlon 64 FX-62 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Bus support | 1000 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | no data | 220 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 154 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 FX-62 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 89 Watt |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Athlon 64 FX-62 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5000+ by 28% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Athlon 64 FX-62 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5000+ by 28% in Passmark.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Performance score | 0.64 | 0.50 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 89 Watt |
The Athlon 64 FX-62 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 FX-62 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
