Core 2 Quad Q7600 vs Athlon 64 FX-55

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3431not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.09no data
DesignerAMDIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date10 October 2004 (21 years ago)31 August 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$180no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 FX-55 and Core 2 Quad Q7600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography130 nm45 nm
Die size193 mm22x 82 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)63 °C71 °C
Number of transistors105 million456 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 FX-55 and Core 2 Quad Q7600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket939775
Power consumption (TDP)104 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 FX-55 and Core 2 Quad Q7600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 FX-55 and Core 2 Quad Q7600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1 Depends on motherboardDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 FX-55 and Core 2 Quad Q7600.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 October 2004 31 August 2009
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 130 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 104 Watt 95 Watt

Core 2 Quad Q7600 has an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 188.9% more advanced lithography process, and 9.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon 64 FX-55 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q7600. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 FX-55
Athlon 64 FX-55
Intel Core 2 Quad Q7600
Core 2 Quad Q7600

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 7 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-55 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 27 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Athlon 64 FX-55 and Core 2 Quad Q7600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.