Core 2 Duo L7300 vs Athlon 64 FX-55

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 FX-55
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 104 Watt
0.25
Core 2 Duo L7300
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.34
+36%

Core 2 Duo L7300 outperforms Athlon 64 FX-55 by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 FX-55 and Core 2 Duo L7300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31633077
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataCore 2 Duo
Power efficiency0.231.89
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date10 October 2004 (20 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$180no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 FX-55 and Core 2 Duo L7300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache0 KB4 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography130 nm65 nm
Die size193 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)63 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.975V-1.062V

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 FX-55 and Core 2 Duo L7300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket939PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)104 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 FX-55 and Core 2 Duo L7300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Athlon 64 FX-55 and Core 2 Duo L7300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 FX-55 and Core 2 Duo L7300 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 FX-55 and Core 2 Duo L7300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1 Depends on motherboardno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 FX-55 0.25
Core 2 Duo L7300 0.34
+36%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 FX-55 404
Core 2 Duo L7300 536
+32.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 0.34
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 130 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 104 Watt 17 Watt

Core 2 Duo L7300 has a 36% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 511.8% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo L7300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 FX-55 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 FX-55 is a desktop processor while Core 2 Duo L7300 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 FX-55 and Core 2 Duo L7300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 FX-55
Athlon 64 FX-55
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300
Core 2 Duo L7300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-55 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 2 Duo L7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 FX-55 or Core 2 Duo L7300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.