A4-9120C vs Athlon 64 FX-55

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 FX-55
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 104 Watt
0.25
A4-9120C
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.54
+116%

A4-9120C outperforms Athlon 64 FX-55 by a whopping 116% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 FX-55 and A4-9120C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31632857
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency0.238.52
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date10 October 2004 (20 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$180no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 FX-55 and A4-9120C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache128 KB160 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography130 nm28 nm
Die size193 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)63 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 FX-55 and A4-9120C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket939BGA
Power consumption (TDP)104 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 FX-55 and A4-9120C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 FX-55 and A4-9120C are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 FX-55 and A4-9120C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1 Depends on motherboardDDR4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data14.936 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 FX-55 0.25
A4-9120C 0.54
+116%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 FX-55 404
A4-9120C 850
+110%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 0.54
Recency 10 October 2004 6 January 2019
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 104 Watt 6 Watt

A4-9120C has a 116% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1633.3% lower power consumption.

The A4-9120C is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 FX-55 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 FX-55 is a desktop processor while A4-9120C is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 FX-55 and A4-9120C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 FX-55
Athlon 64 FX-55
AMD A4-9120C
A4-9120C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-55 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 80 votes

Rate A4-9120C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 FX-55 or A4-9120C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.