Opteron X2 185 vs Athlon 64 3500+

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 3500+ and Opteron X2 185 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Desktop processor	Server
Architecture codename	San Diego (2001−2005)	Denmark (2005−2006)
Release date	January 2001 (23 years ago)	6 March 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$59	$435

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 3500+ and Opteron X2 185 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	1	2
Base clock speed	no data	2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	2.2 GHz	2.6 GHz
L1 cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	512 KB	1 MB
L3 cache	0 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	130 nm	90 nm
Die size	230 mm2	199 mm2
Number of transistors	227 million	233 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 3500+ and Opteron X2 185 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	2
Socket	939	939
Power consumption (TDP)	89 Watt	110 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 3500+ and Opteron X2 185. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

no data

DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Pros & cons summary

---

Physical cores	1	2
Threads	1	2
Chip lithography	130 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	89 Watt	110 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 3500+ and Opteron X2 185, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---