Ryzen Embedded V2546 vs Athlon 64 3400+

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 3400+
2001
1 core / 1 thread, 89 Watt
0.20
Ryzen Embedded V2546
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 35 Watt
10.22
+5010%

Ryzen Embedded V2546 outperforms Athlon 64 3400+ by a whopping 5010% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 3400+ and Ryzen Embedded V2546 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3231764
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen Embedded
Power efficiency0.2127.62
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Renoir (2020−2023)
Release dateJanuary 2001 (23 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 3400+ and Ryzen Embedded V2546 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.95 GHz
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512K512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm7 nm
Die size193 mm2156 mm2
Number of transistors105 million9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 3400+ and Ryzen Embedded V2546 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754FP6
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 3400+ and Ryzen Embedded V2546. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 3400+ and Ryzen Embedded V2546 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 3400+ and Ryzen Embedded V2546. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.269 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics 384SP

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 3400+ and Ryzen Embedded V2546.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 3400+ 0.20
Ryzen Embedded V2546 10.22
+5010%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 3400+ 317
Ryzen Embedded V2546 16236
+5022%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.20 10.22
Physical cores 1 6
Threads 1 12
Chip lithography 130 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen Embedded V2546 has a 5010% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process, and 154.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Embedded V2546 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 3400+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 3400+ and Ryzen Embedded V2546, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 3400+
Athlon 64 3400+
AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546
Ryzen Embedded V2546

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 20 votes

Rate Athlon 64 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Embedded V2546 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 3400+ or Ryzen Embedded V2546, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.