Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ vs Athlon 64 3000+

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 3000+ and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataMobile Athlon 64
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Newark (2003)
Release dateJanuary 2001 (23 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$65no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 3000+ and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512Kno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography130 nm90 nm
Die size193 mm2no data
Number of transistors154 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 3000+ and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket754no data
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt62 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 3000+ 334
+6.7%
Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ 313

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 62 Watt

Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 43.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 3000+ and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 3000+ is a desktop processor while Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 3000+ and Mobile Athlon 64 4000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 3000+
Athlon 64 3000+
AMD Mobile Athlon 64 4000+
Mobile Athlon 64 4000+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 113 votes

Rate Athlon 64 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 5 votes

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 3000+ or Mobile Athlon 64 4000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.