Athlon Gold 7220U vs Athlon 64 3000+

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 3000+
2001
1 core / 1 thread, 89 Watt
0.21
Athlon Gold 7220U
2022
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.92
+1290%

Athlon Gold 7220U outperforms Athlon 64 3000+ by a whopping 1290% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon Gold 7220U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32181661
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataMendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Power efficiency0.2218.42
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023)
Release dateJanuary 2001 (23 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$65no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon Gold 7220U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm6 nm
Die size193 mm2100 mm2
Number of transistors154 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon Gold 7220U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754FP6
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon Gold 7220U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon Gold 7220U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon Gold 7220U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5 Dual-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon Gold 7220U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 3000+ 0.21
Athlon Gold 7220U 2.92
+1290%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 3000+ 334
Athlon Gold 7220U 4636
+1288%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 2.92
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 130 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 15 Watt

Athlon Gold 7220U has a 1290.5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process, and 493.3% lower power consumption.

The Athlon Gold 7220U is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 3000+ in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 3000+ is a desktop processor while Athlon Gold 7220U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 3000+ and Athlon Gold 7220U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 3000+
Athlon 64 3000+
AMD Athlon Gold 7220U
Athlon Gold 7220U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 116 votes

Rate Athlon 64 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 97 votes

Rate Athlon Gold 7220U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 3000+ or Athlon Gold 7220U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.