Celeron 3855U vs Athlon 5350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 5350
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.15
+38.6%

Athlon 5350 outperforms Celeron 3855U by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 5350 and Celeron 3855U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22872488
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date9 April 2014 (10 years ago)15 August 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107
Current price$169 $315 (2.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 5350 and Celeron 3855U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.05 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.05 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus supportno data4 GT/s
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size107 mm298.57 mm210.3 mm × 9.57 mm
Maximum core temperature76 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1750 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 5350 and Celeron 3855U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM1FCBGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 5350 and Celeron 3855U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4no data
AVX+no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data
RAID-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSXno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPPno data-
Smart Responseno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Athlon 5350 and Celeron 3855U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPXno data-
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 5350 and Celeron 3855U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 5350 and Celeron 3855U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1600, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.1 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R3 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 510
Number of pipelines128no data
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data
Graphics max frequencyno data900 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 5350 and Celeron 3855U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Athlon 5350 and Celeron 3855U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon 5350 and Celeron 3855U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 1212
OpenGLno data4.4
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 5350 and Celeron 3855U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes410

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 5350 1.15
+38.6%
Celeron 3855U 0.83

Athlon 5350 outperforms Celeron 3855U by 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Athlon 5350 1775
+38.8%
Celeron 3855U 1279

Athlon 5350 outperforms Celeron 3855U by 39% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon 5350 221
Celeron 3855U 304
+37.6%

Celeron 3855U outperforms Athlon 5350 by 38% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Athlon 5350 664
+30.5%
Celeron 3855U 509

Athlon 5350 outperforms Celeron 3855U by 30% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.15 0.83
Recency 9 April 2014 15 August 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt

The Athlon 5350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3855U in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 5350 is a desktop processor while Celeron 3855U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 5350 and Celeron 3855U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 5350
Athlon 5350
Intel Celeron 3855U
Celeron 3855U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 22 votes

Rate Athlon 5350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 27 votes

Rate Celeron 3855U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 5350 or Celeron 3855U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.