Ultra 7 265F vs Athlon 300U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 300U and Core Ultra 7 265F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1772not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Athlonno data
Power efficiency15.32no data
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge 2 (2019)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

Athlon 300U and Core Ultra 7 265F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz5.3 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache128K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size209.78 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors4940 Million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 300U and Core Ultra 7 265F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP51851
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 300U and Core Ultra 7 265F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Athlon 300U and Core Ultra 7 265F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 300U and Core Ultra 7 265F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 300U and Core Ultra 7 265F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 300U and Core Ultra 7 265F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1220

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 20
Threads 4 20
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

Athlon 300U has 333.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265F, on the other hand, has 900% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 300U and Core Ultra 7 265F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Athlon 300U is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 300U and Core Ultra 7 265F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 300U
Athlon 300U
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
Core Ultra 7 265F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 460 votes

Rate Athlon 300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 7 265F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 300U or Core Ultra 7 265F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.