Atom E3845 vs Athlon 200GE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 200GE
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.69
+290%

Athlon 200GE outperforms Atom E3845 by a whopping 290% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 200GE and Atom E3845 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17182736
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.27no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD AthlonAtom
Power efficiency7.016.29
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Bay Trail-I (2013)
Release date6 September 2018 (6 years ago)8 October 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$55no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 200GE and Atom E3845 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.91 GHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache192 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Number of transistors4950 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 200GE and Atom E3845 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4Intel BGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 200GE and Atom E3845. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 200GE and Atom E3845 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 200GE and Atom E3845. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3Intel HD Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 200GE and Atom E3845.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 200GE 2.69
+290%
Atom E3845 0.69

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 200GE 4114
+291%
Atom E3845 1052

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.69 0.69
Integrated graphics card 2.98 0.77
Recency 6 September 2018 8 October 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 10 Watt

Athlon 200GE has a 289.9% higher aggregate performance score, 287% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Atom E3845, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores, and 250% lower power consumption.

The Athlon 200GE is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom E3845 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 200GE is a desktop processor while Atom E3845 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 200GE and Atom E3845, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 200GE
Athlon 200GE
Intel Atom E3845
Atom E3845

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 761 vote

Rate Athlon 200GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 18 votes

Rate Atom E3845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 200GE or Atom E3845, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.