Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) outperforms Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 by an impressive 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 180 | 500 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M4 | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Power efficiency | 64.26 | 48.77 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 1 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 14 | 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 54 MHz |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Apple M4 20-core GPU | AMD Radeon 880M |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
CrossMark Overall
WebXPRT 4 Overall
Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 27.16 | 14.43 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 8 |
| Threads | 14 | 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 28 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) has a 88.2% higher aggregate performance score, 75% more physical cores, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has 14.3% more threads, and 42.9% lower power consumption.
The Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 in performance tests.
Note that Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is a desktop processor while Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
