Celeron G6900T vs Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) outperforms Celeron G6900T by a whopping 978% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron G6900T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 180 | 1749 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Series | Apple M4 | no data |
Power efficiency | 64.26 | 6.81 |
Architecture codename | no data | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron G6900T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 14 | 2 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 1.25 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 4 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 3 nm | Intel 7 nm |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron G6900T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | no data | FCLGA1700 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron G6900T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
TSX | - | + |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron G6900T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron G6900T are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron G6900T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 76.8 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Apple M4 20-core GPU | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Clear Video HD | no data | + |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.3 GHz |
Execution Units | no data | 16 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 4 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz |
Max resolution over eDP | no data | 5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron G6900T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | 12 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron G6900T.
PCIe version | no data | 5.0 and 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 27.16 | 2.52 |
Recency | 30 October 2024 | 4 January 2022 |
Physical cores | 14 | 2 |
Threads | 14 | 2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 35 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) has a 977.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads.
Celeron G6900T, on the other hand, has 14.3% lower power consumption.
The Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G6900T in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron G6900T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.