Celeron Dual-Core T3500 vs Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T3500 by a whopping 2878% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 288 | 2843 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M4 | Intel Celeron Dual-Core |
| Power efficiency | 22.97 | 0.88 |
| Designer | Apple | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 26 September 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $80 |
Detailed specifications
M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 14 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 107 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | Socket P PGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 35 Watt |
Security technologies
M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 20-core GPU | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 21.74 | 0.73 |
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 26 September 2010 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 2 |
| Threads | 14 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 35 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) has a 2878.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron Dual-Core T3500, on the other hand, has 14.3% lower power consumption.
The Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
