Celeron N3350E vs Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)

VS

Primary details

Comparing M4 Pro (12 cores) and Celeron N3350E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking170not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesApple M4no data
Power efficiency82.46no data
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)1 July 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

M4 Pro (12 cores) and Celeron N3350E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2.592 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz2.4 GHz
L2 cache4 MBno data
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography3 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on M4 Pro (12 cores) and Celeron N3350E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and Celeron N3350E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
Smart Idleno data-

Security technologies

M4 Pro (12 cores) and Celeron N3350E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and Celeron N3350E are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and Celeron N3350E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M4 16-core GPUIntel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data650 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of M4 Pro (12 cores) and Celeron N3350E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and Celeron N3350E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and Celeron N3350E.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 October 2024 1 July 2019
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 6 Watt

Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) has an age advantage of 5 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron N3350E, on the other hand, has 433.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between M4 Pro (12 cores) and Celeron N3350E. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is a desktop processor while Celeron N3350E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) and Celeron N3350E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
M4 Pro (12 cores)
Intel Celeron N3350E
Celeron N3350E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 25 votes

Rate M4 Pro (12 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 5 votes

Rate Celeron N3350E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M4 Pro (12 cores) or Celeron N3350E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.