Celeron N3350E vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)

VS

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Celeron N3350E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking168not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M4no data
Power efficiency29.41no data
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)1 July 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Celeron N3350E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)no data
Threads162
Base clock speedno data1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz2.4 GHz
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography3 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Celeron N3350E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Celeron N3350E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
Smart Idleno data-

Security technologies

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Celeron N3350E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Celeron N3350E are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Celeron N3350E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M4 40-core GPUIntel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data650 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Celeron N3350E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Celeron N3350E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Celeron N3350E.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 October 2024 1 July 2019
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 6 Watt

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has an age advantage of 5 years, 700% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron N3350E, on the other hand, has 1400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Celeron N3350E. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Celeron N3350E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)
Intel Celeron N3350E
Celeron N3350E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 5 votes

Rate Celeron N3350E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Max (16 cores) or Celeron N3350E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.