Ryzen AI Max 385 vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)

VS

Primary details

Comparing M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen AI Max 385 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking167not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M4no data
Power efficiency29.43no data
Architecture codenameno dataStrix Halo (2025)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)6 January 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen AI Max 385 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz5 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm4 nm
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen AI Max 385 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFP11
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen AI Max 385. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen AI Max 385 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M4 40-core GPURadeon 8050S

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen AI Max 385.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 October 2024 6 January 2025
Physical cores 16 8
Chip lithography 3 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 55 Watt

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has 100% more physical cores, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen AI Max 385, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, and 63.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen AI Max 385. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen AI Max 385, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
Ryzen AI Max 385

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 16 votes

Rate M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen AI Max 385 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M4 Max (16 cores) or Ryzen AI Max 385, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.