Xeon E3-1230 v3 vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2024
16 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
28.09
+555%
Xeon E3-1230 v3
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
4.29

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) outperforms Xeon E3-1230 v3 by a whopping 555% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon E3-1230 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1661372
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.13
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple M4Xeon (Desktop)
Power efficiency29.545.07
Architecture codenameno dataHaswell-WS (2013−2014)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)2 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$240

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon E3-1230 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data256K (per core)
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data160 mm2
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon E3-1230 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCLGA1150
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon E3-1230 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon E3-1230 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon E3-1230 v3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon E3-1230 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M4 40-core GPUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon E3-1230 v3.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.09 4.29
Recency 30 October 2024 2 June 2013
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 3 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 80 Watt

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has a 554.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 633.3% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E3-1230 v3, on the other hand, has 12.5% lower power consumption.

The M4 Max (16 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1230 v3 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook processor while Xeon E3-1230 v3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Xeon E3-1230 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
Xeon E3-1230 v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 4 votes

Rate M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 560 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1230 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M4 Max (16 cores) or Xeon E3-1230 v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.