Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
Primary details
Comparing M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 167 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Apple M4 | no data |
Power efficiency | 29.43 | no data |
Architecture codename | no data | Strix Halo (2025) |
Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 6 January 2025 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
Threads | 16 | 32 |
Base clock speed | no data | 3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 64 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | no data | FP11 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 40-core GPU | Radeon 8060S |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395.
PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 30 October 2024 | 6 January 2025 |
Threads | 16 | 32 |
Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 55 Watt |
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.
Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, 100% more threads, and 63.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.