FX-6330 vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) outperforms FX-6330 by a whopping 902% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing M4 Max (16 cores) and FX-6330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 171 | 1700 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 29.42 | 2.11 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 15 December 2015 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
M4 Max (16 cores) and FX-6330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 6 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 288 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 315 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M4 Max (16 cores) and FX-6330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and FX-6330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and FX-6330 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and FX-6330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 40-core GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and FX-6330.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 27.75 | 2.77 |
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 15 December 2015 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 6 |
| Threads | 16 | 6 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 125 Watt |
Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has a 901.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, a 966.7% more advanced lithography process, and 38.9% lower power consumption.
The M4 Max (16 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6330 in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook processor while FX-6330 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and FX-6330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
