Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Apple M3 Pro 12-Core

Aggregate performance score

Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 27 Watt
16.20
+35.8%
Ryzen 9 4900HS
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
11.93

Apple M3 Pro 12-Core outperforms Ryzen 9 4900HS by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M3 Pro 12-Core and Ryzen 9 4900HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking407643
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M3AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Power efficiency56.7832.26
Architecture codenameno dataRenoir (Zen 2) (2020)
Release date30 October 2023 (1 year ago)7 March 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M3 Pro 12-Core and Ryzen 9 4900HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1216
Base clock speed2.748 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.06 GHz4.3 GHz
Multiplierno data30
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors37000 Million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Apple M3 Pro 12-Core and Ryzen 9 4900HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFP6
Power consumption (TDP)27 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M3 Pro 12-Core and Ryzen 9 4900HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M3 Pro 12-Core and Ryzen 9 4900HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M3 Pro 12-Core and Ryzen 9 4900HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-4266
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M3 Pro 12-Core and Ryzen 9 4900HS.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M3 Pro 12-Core 16.20
+35.8%
Ryzen 9 4900HS 11.93

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M3 Pro 12-Core 25740
+35.8%
Ryzen 9 4900HS 18954

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Apple M3 Pro 12-Core 2163
+16.1%
Ryzen 9 4900HS 1863

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Apple M3 Pro 12-Core 15298
+99.3%
Ryzen 9 4900HS 7675

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Apple M3 Pro 12-Core 2327
+91.1%
Ryzen 9 4900HS 1218

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.20 11.93
Recency 30 October 2023 7 March 2020
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 12 16
Chip lithography 3 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 35 Watt

Apple M3 Pro 12-Core has a 35.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 50% more physical cores, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 29.6% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 4900HS, on the other hand, has 33.3% more threads.

The Apple M3 Pro 12-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 9 4900HS in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Pro 12-Core and Ryzen 9 4900HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
M3 Pro 12-Core
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
Ryzen 9 4900HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 101 vote

Rate Apple M3 Pro 12-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 146 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 4900HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M3 Pro 12-Core or Ryzen 9 4900HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.