Turion II M520 vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core
Aggregate performance score
Apple M3 Max 16-Core outperforms Turion II M520 by a whopping 4569% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing M3 Max 16-Core and Turion II M520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 198 | 2857 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M3 | AMD Turion II |
| Power efficiency | 31.40 | 1.50 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Caspian (2009) |
| Release date | 30 October 2023 (1 year ago) | 10 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
M3 Max 16-Core and Turion II M520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.748 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.06 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 3600 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 45 nm |
| Number of transistors | 92000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M3 Max 16-Core and Turion II M520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 78 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Turion II M520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization |
| PowerNow | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 25.68 | 0.55 |
| Recency | 30 October 2023 | 10 September 2009 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 78 Watt | 35 Watt |
Apple M3 Max 16-Core has a 4569.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.
Turion II M520, on the other hand, has 122.9% lower power consumption.
The M3 Max 16-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II M520 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Turion II M520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
