EPYC 7401P vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M3 Max 16-Core
2023
16 cores / 1612 x 4.1 GHz Apple M3 P-Core4 x 2.7 GHz Apple M3 E-Core threads, 78 Watt
21.83
+18.3%

Apple M3 Max 16-Core outperforms EPYC 7401P by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M3 Max 16-Core and EPYC 7401P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking224299
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data32.11
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple M3AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameno dataNaples (2017−2018)
Release date30 October 2023 (less than a year ago)29 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,075
Current priceno data$212 (0.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Apple M3 Max 16-Core and EPYC 7401P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1612 x 4.1  GHz Apple M3 P-Core4 x 2.7  GHz Apple M3 E-Core48
Base clock speed2.748 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.06 GHz3 GHz
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Number of transistors92000 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Apple M3 Max 16-Core and EPYC 7401P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataTR4
Power consumption (TDP)78 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and EPYC 7401P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and EPYC 7401P are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and EPYC 7401P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data170.671 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M3 Max 40-Core GPUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and EPYC 7401P.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.83 18.46
Recency 30 October 2023 29 June 2017
Physical cores 16 24
Threads 1612 x 4.1 GHz Apple M3 P-Core4 x 2.7 GHz Apple M3 E-Core 48
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 78 Watt 170 Watt

The Apple M3 Max 16-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7401P in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M3 Max 16-Core is a notebook processor while EPYC 7401P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and EPYC 7401P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M3 Max 16-Core
M3 Max 16-Core
AMD EPYC 7401P
EPYC 7401P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 205 votes

Rate Apple M3 Max 16-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 12 votes

Rate EPYC 7401P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M3 Max 16-Core or EPYC 7401P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.