EPYC 7302P vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M3 Max 16-Core
2023
16 cores / 1612 x 4.1 GHz Apple M3 P-Core4 x 2.7 GHz Apple M3 E-Core threads, 78 Watt
21.83
+3.4%

Apple M3 Max 16-Core outperforms EPYC 7302P by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M3 Max 16-Core and EPYC 7302P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking224237
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data15.81
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple M3AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameno dataZen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date30 October 2023 (less than a year ago)7 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$825
Current priceno data$864 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Apple M3 Max 16-Core and EPYC 7302P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1612 x 4.1  GHz Apple M3 P-Core4 x 2.7  GHz Apple M3 E-Core32
Base clock speed2.748 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.06 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Number of transistors92000 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Apple M3 Max 16-Core and EPYC 7302P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataTR4
Power consumption (TDP)78 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and EPYC 7302P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and EPYC 7302P are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and EPYC 7302P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M3 Max 40-Core GPUno data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.83 21.12
Recency 30 October 2023 7 August 2019
Threads 1612 x 4.1 GHz Apple M3 P-Core4 x 2.7 GHz Apple M3 E-Core 32
Chip lithography 3 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 78 Watt 155 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and EPYC 7302P.

Be aware that Apple M3 Max 16-Core is a notebook processor while EPYC 7302P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and EPYC 7302P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M3 Max 16-Core
M3 Max 16-Core
AMD EPYC 7302P
EPYC 7302P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 205 votes

Rate Apple M3 Max 16-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7302P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M3 Max 16-Core or EPYC 7302P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.