Core 2 Duo P8400 vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M3 Max 16-Core
2023
16 cores / 16 threads, 78 Watt
25.85
+4777%
Core 2 Duo P8400
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.53

Apple M3 Max 16-Core outperforms Core 2 Duo P8400 by a whopping 4777% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Core 2 Duo P8400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1942860
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M3Intel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency31.362.01
Architecture codenameno dataPenryn (2008−2011)
Release date30 October 2023 (1 year ago)15 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$209

Detailed specifications

Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Core 2 Duo P8400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed2.748 GHz2.26 GHz
Boost clock speed4.06 GHz2.26 GHz
Bus rateno data1066 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data3 MB
L3 cacheno data3 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography3 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors92000 Million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
VID voltage rangeno data1.05V-1.15V

Compatibility

Information on Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Core 2 Duo P8400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataBGA479,PBGA479,PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)78 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Core 2 Duo P8400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Core 2 Duo P8400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Core 2 Duo P8400 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M3 Max 40-Core GPUno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 25.85
+4777%
Core 2 Duo P8400 0.53

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 41068
+4737%
Core 2 Duo P8400 849

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.85 0.53
Recency 30 October 2023 15 July 2008
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 3 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 78 Watt 25 Watt

Apple M3 Max 16-Core has a 4777.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo P8400, on the other hand, has 212% lower power consumption.

The Apple M3 Max 16-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo P8400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Core 2 Duo P8400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M3 Max 16-Core
M3 Max 16-Core
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
Core 2 Duo P8400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 276 votes

Rate Apple M3 Max 16-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 84 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M3 Max 16-Core or Core 2 Duo P8400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.