Celeron T1700 vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M3 Max 16-Core
2023
16 cores / 16 threads, 78 Watt
25.85
+3758%

Apple M3 Max 16-Core outperforms Celeron T1700 by a whopping 3758% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron T1700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1942751
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M3no data
Power efficiency31.361.81
Release date30 October 2023 (1 year ago)1 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron T1700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)no data
Threads16no data
Base clock speed2.748 GHz1.83 GHz
Boost clock speed4.06 GHzno data
L3 cacheno data1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography3 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors92000 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
VID voltage rangeno data1.075V-1.175V

Compatibility

Information on Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron T1700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataPPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)78 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron T1700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron T1700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron T1700 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M3 Max 40-Core GPUno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 25.85
+3758%
Celeron T1700 0.67

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 41060
+3781%
Celeron T1700 1058

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.85 0.67
Recency 30 October 2023 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 3 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 78 Watt 35 Watt

Apple M3 Max 16-Core has a 3758.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron T1700, on the other hand, has 122.9% lower power consumption.

The Apple M3 Max 16-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron T1700 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Celeron T1700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M3 Max 16-Core
M3 Max 16-Core
Intel Celeron T1700
Celeron T1700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 275 votes

Rate Apple M3 Max 16-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Celeron T1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M3 Max 16-Core or Celeron T1700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.