Ryzen Z2 Go vs Apple M1 Pro
Aggregate performance score
M1 Pro outperforms Ryzen Z2 by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1031 | 1375 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M-Series | AMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 9.53 |
| Designer | Apple | AMD |
| Architecture codename | no data | Rembrandt R (2025) |
| Release date | 18 October 2021 (4 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of M1 Pro and Ryzen Z2 Go: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 10 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.064 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.22 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 2.9 MB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 28 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 24 MB | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Number of transistors | 33700 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on M1 Pro and Ryzen Z2 Go compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | W | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M1 Pro and Ryzen Z2 Go. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU | AMD Radeon 680M |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core
CrossMark Overall
Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 10.04 | 6.45 |
| Recency | 18 October 2021 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 4 |
| Threads | 10 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm |
Apple M1 Pro has a 56% higher aggregate performance score, 150% more physical cores and 25% more threads, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.
Ryzen Z2 Go, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years.
The Apple M1 Pro is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Z2 Go in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
