Ultra 7 265K vs Apple M1 Max

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M1 Max
2021
10 cores / 10 threads
13.91
Core Ultra 7 265K
2024
20 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
37.22
+168%

Core Ultra 7 265K outperforms Apple M1 Max by a whopping 168% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing M1 Max and Core Ultra 7 265K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking53485
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data94.56
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesApple M-Seriesno data
Power efficiencyno data28.18
Architecture codenameno dataArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date18 October 2021 (3 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$394

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

M1 Max and Core Ultra 7 265K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads1020
Base clock speed2.06 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.22 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache2.9 MB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache28 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache48 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Number of transistors57000 Million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on M1 Max and Core Ultra 7 265K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data1851
Power consumption (TDP)no data125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M1 Max and Core Ultra 7 265K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
SIPP-+

Security technologies

M1 Max and Core Ultra 7 265K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M1 Max and Core Ultra 7 265K are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M1 Max and Core Ultra 7 265K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M1 Max 32-Core GPUArc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M1 Max and Core Ultra 7 265K.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M1 Max 13.91
Ultra 7 265K 37.22
+168%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M1 Max 22098
Ultra 7 265K 59118
+168%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.91 37.22
Recency 18 October 2021 24 October 2024
Physical cores 10 20
Threads 10 20
Chip lithography 5 nm 3 nm

Ultra 7 265K has a 167.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 265K is our recommended choice as it beats the M1 Max in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M1 Max is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M1 Max and Core Ultra 7 265K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M1 Max
M1 Max
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Core Ultra 7 265K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 692 votes

Rate M1 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 87 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M1 Max or Core Ultra 7 265K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.