Atom Z510 vs A9-9425

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A9-9425 and Atom Z510 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1930not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Atom
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$20
Current price$561 $45 (2.3x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

A9-9425 and Atom Z510 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed3.1 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz1.1 GHz
Bus supportno data400 MT/s
L1 cache128K (per core)56 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size124.5 mm224.18 mm27.8 mm × 3.1 mm
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data0.75-1.1V

Compatibility

Information on A9-9425 and Atom Z510 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFT4PBGA441
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9425 and Atom Z510. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-2133 RAM (1 channel), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRANDIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FSB parityno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

A9-9425 and Atom Z510 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9425 and Atom Z510 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9425 and Atom Z510. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A9-9425 1511
+679%
Atom Z510 194

A9-9425 outperforms Atom Z510 by 679% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2016 2 April 2008
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 2 Watt

We couldn't decide between A9-9425 and Atom Z510. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9425 and Atom Z510, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9425
A9-9425
Intel Atom Z510
Atom Z510

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1512 votes

Rate A9-9425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Atom Z510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9425 or Atom Z510, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.