Xeon W-3275M vs A9-9410

VS

Aggregate performance score

A9-9410
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.96
Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.35
+2541%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms A9-9410 by a whopping 2541% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A9-9410 and Xeon W-3275M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2503201
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.07
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Xeon W
Power efficiency6.0611.70
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,453

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A9-9410 and Xeon W-3275M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads256
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data25
L1 cacheno data1.75 MB
L2 cache2048 KB28 MB
L3 cache0 KB38.5 MB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size125 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C76 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A9-9410 and Xeon W-3275M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP4FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9410 and Xeon W-3275M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

A9-9410 and Xeon W-3275M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9410 and Xeon W-3275M are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9410 and Xeon W-3275M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TB
Max memory channels16
Maximum memory bandwidthno data140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count3no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A9-9410 and Xeon W-3275M integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A9-9410 and Xeon W-3275M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9410 and Xeon W-3275M.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A9-9410 0.96
Xeon W-3275M 25.35
+2541%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A9-9410 1528
Xeon W-3275M 40261
+2535%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 25.35
Recency 31 May 2016 3 June 2019
Physical cores 2 28
Threads 2 56
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 205 Watt

A9-9410 has 1266.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3275M, on the other hand, has a 2540.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9410 in performance tests.

Be aware that A9-9410 is a notebook processor while Xeon W-3275M is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9410 and Xeon W-3275M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9410
A9-9410
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 115 votes

Rate A9-9410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 64 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9410 or Xeon W-3275M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.