PRO A6-8570E vs A9-9410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A9-9410
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.88

PRO A6-8570E outperforms A9-9410 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27622732
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency2.490.59
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date31 May 2016 (9 years ago)October 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A9-9410 and PRO A6-8570E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.9 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.4 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB1024 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size125 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A9-9410 and PRO A6-8570E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9410 and PRO A6-8570E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC++
FreeSync++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9410 and PRO A6-8570E are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9410 and PRO A6-8570E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133DDR4-2400
Max memory channels12

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 GraphicsAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core count34
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics++
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A9-9410 and PRO A6-8570E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+n/a
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A9-9410 and PRO A6-8570E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9410 and PRO A6-8570E.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A9-9410 0.88
PRO A6-8570E 0.91
+3.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A9-9410 1550
Samples: 320
PRO A6-8570E 1606
+3.6%
Samples: 16

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.88 0.91
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

A9-9410 has 333.3% lower power consumption.

PRO A6-8570E, on the other hand, has a 3.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD A9-9410 and AMD PRO A6-8570E.

Be aware that A9-9410 is a notebook processor while PRO A6-8570E is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9410
A9-9410
AMD PRO A6-8570E
PRO A6-8570E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 135 votes

Rate A9-9410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 15 votes

Rate PRO A6-8570E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A9-9410 and PRO A6-8570E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.