Atom D425 vs A9-9410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A9-9410 and Atom D425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2382not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)21 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$993
Current price$722 $85 (0.1x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

A9-9410 and Atom D425 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.9 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz1.83 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size125 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million123 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A9-9410 and Atom D425 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP4FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9410 and Atom D425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow-no data
PowerGating-no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect-no data
RAID-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data-
Thermal Monitoringno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

A9-9410 and Atom D425 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9410 and Atom D425 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-
IOMMU 2.0-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9410 and Atom D425. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channels11
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 GraphicsIntel GMA 3150
iGPU core count3no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A9-9410 and Atom D425 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A9-9410 and Atom D425 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9410 and Atom D425.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A9-9410 1527
+667%
Atom D425 199

A9-9410 outperforms Atom D425 by 667% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2016 21 June 2010
Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

We couldn't decide between A9-9410 and Atom D425. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9410 and Atom D425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9410
A9-9410
Intel Atom D425
Atom D425

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 111 votes

Rate A9-9410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 62 votes

Rate Atom D425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9410 or Atom D425, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.