Athlon 64 3000+ vs A9-9410

Primary details

Comparing A9-9410 and Athlon 64 3000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2488	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	AMD Bristol Ridge	no data
Power efficiency	6.02	no data
Architecture codename	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Release date	31 May 2016 (8 years ago)	January 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$65

Detailed specifications

A9-9410 and Athlon 64 3000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	2	1
Base clock speed	2.9 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	3.5 GHz	2 GHz
L1 cache	no data	128 KB
L2 cache	2048 KB	512K
L3 cache	no data	0 KB
Chip lithography	28 nm	130 nm
Die size	125 mm2	193 mm2
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	74 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,200 million	154 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on A9-9410 and Athlon 64 3000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FP4	754
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9410 and Athlon 64 3000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Virtualization,	no data
AES-NI	+	-
FMA	+	-
AVX	+	-
FRTC	+	-
FreeSync	+	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9410 and Athlon 64 3000+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9410 and Athlon 64 3000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2133	no data
Max memory channels	1	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics	no data
iGPU core count	3	no data
Enduro	+	-
Switchable graphics	+	-
UVD	+	-
VCE	+	-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A9-9410 and Athlon 64 3000+ integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A9-9410 and Athlon 64 3000+ integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	no data
Vulkan	+	-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9410 and Athlon 64 3000+.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	8	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Physical cores	2	1
Threads	2	1
Chip lithography	28 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	89 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9410 and Athlon 64 3000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---