Opteron 6278 vs A8-7600
Aggregate performance score
Opteron 6278 outperforms A8-7600 by a whopping 327% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A8-7600 and Opteron 6278 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1854 | 838 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Architecture codename | Kaveri (2014−2015) | Interlagos (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 31 July 2014 (10 years ago) | 1 May 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A8-7600 and Opteron 6278 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 16 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 8 MB (per die) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 245 mm2 | 316 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 2,411 million | 2,400 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on A8-7600 and Opteron 6278 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 4 |
| Socket | FM2+ | G34 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 115 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7600 and Opteron 6278. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| FRTC | + | - |
| FreeSync | + | - |
| DualGraphics | + | - |
| TrueAudio | + | - |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| PowerGating | + | - |
| Out-of-band client management | + | - |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| HSA | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7600 and Opteron 6278 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7600 and Opteron 6278. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-2133 | DDR3 |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | no data |
| iGPU core count | 6 | no data |
| Number of pipelines | 384 | no data |
| Enduro | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A8-7600 and Opteron 6278 integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A8-7600 and Opteron 6278 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
| Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7600 and Opteron 6278.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.08 | 8.88 |
| Recency | 31 July 2014 | 1 May 2012 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 16 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 115 Watt |
A8-7600 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 76.9% lower power consumption.
Opteron 6278, on the other hand, has a 326.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
The Opteron 6278 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-7600 in performance tests.
Note that A8-7600 is a desktop processor while Opteron 6278 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7600 and Opteron 6278, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
