Celeron 3855U vs A8-6600K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-6600K
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.71
+148%

A8-6600K outperforms Celeron 3855U by a whopping 148% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21992884
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.310.06
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)Intel Celeron
Power efficiency0.721.94
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date1 June 2013 (12 years ago)15 August 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$142$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A8-6600K has 417% better value for money than Celeron 3855U.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

A8-6600K and Celeron 3855U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.9 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataOPI
Bus rateno data4 GT/s
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache192 KB128 KB
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm298.57 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million1750 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A8-6600K and Celeron 3855U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFM2FCBGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-6600K and Celeron 3855U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data+

Security technologies

A8-6600K and Celeron 3855U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-6600K and Celeron 3855U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-6600K and Celeron 3855U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR4-1866/2133, LPDDR3-1600/1866, DDR3L-1333/1600
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8570DIntel HD Graphics 510
จำนวนพาธไลน์256no data
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data900 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-6600K and Celeron 3855U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by A8-6600K and Celeron 3855U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-6600K and Celeron 3855U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 1112
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-6600K and Celeron 3855U.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data10

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A8-6600K 1.71
+148%
Celeron 3855U 0.69

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A8-6600K Samples: 1087 3001
+147%
Celeron 3855U Samples: 71 1215

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A8-6600K 450
+45.6%
Celeron 3855U 309

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A8-6600K 1075
+98.7%
Celeron 3855U 541

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.71 0.69
Integrated graphics card 0.96 1.40
Recency 1 June 2013 15 August 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 15 Watt

A8-6600K has a 147.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron 3855U, on the other hand, has 45.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

The AMD A8-6600K is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron 3855U in performance tests.

Note that A8-6600K is a desktop processor while Celeron 3855U is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-6600K
A8-6600K
Intel Celeron 3855U
Celeron 3855U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 505 votes

Rate A8-6600K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 35 votes

Rate Celeron 3855U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A8-6600K and Celeron 3855U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.