Core 2 Duo T9500 vs A8-6410

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A8-6410
2014
4 cores / 4 threads
1.14

Core 2 Duo T9500 outperforms A8-6410 by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-6410 and Core 2 Duo T9500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22632250
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Core 2 Duo
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 June 2014 (9 years ago)10 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$530
Current price$334 $103 (0.2x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

A8-6410 and Core 2 Duo T9500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus supportno data800 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2048 KB6 MB
L3 cacheno data6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Number of transistors930 Million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.25V

Compatibility

Information on A8-6410 and Core 2 Duo T9500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFT3bBGA479,PBGA479,PGA478,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-6410 and Core 2 Duo T9500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTno data
AES-NI+no data
FMAFMA4no data
AVX+no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management-no data
VirusProtect+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

A8-6410 and Core 2 Duo T9500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-6410 and Core 2 Duo T9500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V1no data
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-6410 and Core 2 Duo T9500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1866no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 Graphicsno data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-6410 and Core 2 Duo T9500 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-6410 and Core 2 Duo T9500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-6410 and Core 2 Duo T9500.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-6410 1.14
Core 2 Duo T9500 1.16
+1.8%

Core 2 Duo T9500 outperforms A8-6410 by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A8-6410 1766
Core 2 Duo T9500 1799
+1.9%

Core 2 Duo T9500 outperforms A8-6410 by 2% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-6410 219
Core 2 Duo T9500 339
+54.8%

Core 2 Duo T9500 outperforms A8-6410 by 55% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-6410 581
+5.1%
Core 2 Duo T9500 553

A8-6410 outperforms Core 2 Duo T9500 by 5% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A8-6410 1887
Core 2 Duo T9500 2950
+56.4%

Core 2 Duo T9500 outperforms A8-6410 by 56% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A8-6410 5872
+8.4%
Core 2 Duo T9500 5419

A8-6410 outperforms Core 2 Duo T9500 by 8% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A8-6410 2866
+21.9%
Core 2 Duo T9500 2352

A8-6410 outperforms Core 2 Duo T9500 by 22% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.14 1.16
Recency 1 June 2014 10 January 2008
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A8-6410 and Core 2 Duo T9500.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-6410 and Core 2 Duo T9500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-6410
A8-6410
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500
Core 2 Duo T9500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 301 vote

Rate A8-6410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 171 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo T9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-6410 or Core 2 Duo T9500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.