Core 2 Duo T9500 vs A8-5557M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A8-5557M
2013
4 cores / 4 threads
1.16
Core 2 Duo T9500
2008
2 cores / 2 threads
1.16

General info

Comparing A8-5557M and Core 2 Duo T9500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22432244
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Core 2 Duo
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 June 2013 (10 years ago)10 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$530
Current price$60 $103 (0.2x MSRP)

Technical specs

A8-5557M and Core 2 Duo T9500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus supportno data800 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)6 MB
L3 cache0 KB6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.25V

Compatibility

Information on A8-5557M and Core 2 Duo T9500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP2BGA479,PBGA479,PGA478,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-5557M and Core 2 Duo T9500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controllerno data
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

A8-5557M and Core 2 Duo T9500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-5557M and Core 2 Duo T9500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-5557M and Core 2 Duo T9500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8550Gno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-5557M 1.16
Core 2 Duo T9500 1.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A8-5557M 1801
+0.1%
Core 2 Duo T9500 1799

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-5557M 363
+7.1%
Core 2 Duo T9500 339

A8-5557M outperforms Core 2 Duo T9500 by 7% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-5557M 1011
+82.8%
Core 2 Duo T9500 553

A8-5557M outperforms Core 2 Duo T9500 by 83% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A8-5557M 2115
Core 2 Duo T9500 2950
+39.5%

Core 2 Duo T9500 outperforms A8-5557M by 39% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A8-5557M 5259
Core 2 Duo T9500 5419
+3%

Core 2 Duo T9500 outperforms A8-5557M by 3% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A8-5557M 2747
+16.8%
Core 2 Duo T9500 2352

A8-5557M outperforms Core 2 Duo T9500 by 17% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 1 June 2013 10 January 2008
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm

We couldn't decide between A8-5557M and Core 2 Duo T9500. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-5557M and Core 2 Duo T9500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-5557M
A8-5557M
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500
Core 2 Duo T9500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 21 vote

Rate A8-5557M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 164 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-5557M or Core 2 Duo T9500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.