Athlon II X4 740 vs A8-5600K
Aggregated performance score
A8-5600K outperforms Athlon II X4 740 by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
Comparing A8-5600K and Athlon II X4 740 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1882 | 1919 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 3.69 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD A-Series (Desktop) | Athlon |
| Architecture codename | Trinity (2012−2013) | Piledriver |
| Release date | 2 October 2012 (11 years ago) | 1 October 2012 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $71 |
| Current price | $52 | no data |
Value for money
Performance per price, higher is better.
Technical specs
A8-5600K and Athlon II X4 740 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128K (per core) | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on A8-5600K and Athlon II X4 740 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FM2 | Socket FM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 65 watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-5600K and Athlon II X4 740 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-5600K and Athlon II X4 740. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 7560D | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
A8-5600K outperforms Athlon II X4 740 by 6% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
A8-5600K outperforms Athlon II X4 740 by 6% in Passmark.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 1.83 | 1.72 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 65 Watt |
We couldn't decide between A8-5600K and Athlon II X4 740. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between A8-5600K and Athlon II X4 740, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
