Atom E3805 vs A8-4500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

A8-4500M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.97
+322%

A8-4500M outperforms Atom E3805 by a whopping 322% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27483476
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAtom
Power efficiency1.173.23
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Bay Trail
Release date15 May 2012 (14 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of A8-4500M and Atom E3805: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.33 GHz
L1 cache192 KBno data
L2 cache4 MB (shared)no data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-4500M and Atom E3805 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1r2no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-4500M and Atom E3805. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-4500M and Atom E3805 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-4500M and Atom E3805. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknownno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7640G (496 - 685 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A8-4500M 0.97
+322%
Atom E3805 0.23

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A8-4500M 1697
+318%
Samples: 1746
Atom E3805 406
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.97 0.23
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 3 Watt

A8-4500M has a 322% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Atom E3805, on the other hand, has a 45% more advanced lithography process, and 1067% lower power consumption.

The AMD A8-4500M is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom E3805 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 363 votes

Rate A8-4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 11 votes

Rate Atom E3805 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A8-4500M and Atom E3805, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.