A6-7400K vs A8-3800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-3800
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.32
+25.7%

A8-3800 outperforms A6-7400K by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-3800 and A6-7400K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21702338
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.06no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date30 June 2011 (13 years ago)31 July 2014 (9 years ago)
Current price$40 $59

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-3800 and A6-7400K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size228 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on A8-3800 and A6-7400K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM1FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-3800 and A6-7400K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
FRTCno data1
FreeSyncno data1
PowerTuneno data-
TrueAudiono data+
PowerNowno data+
PowerGatingno data+
Out-of-band client managementno data+
VirusProtectno data+
HSAno data1

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3800 and A6-7400K are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3800 and A6-7400K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1866
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6550DAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
Number of pipelinesno data256
Endurono data+
Switchable graphicsno data1
UVDno data+
VCEno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-3800 and A6-7400K integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-3800 and A6-7400K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkanno data1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-3800 and A6-7400K.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-3800 1.32
+25.7%
A6-7400K 1.05

A8-3800 outperforms A6-7400K by 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A8-3800 2044
+25.9%
A6-7400K 1623

A8-3800 outperforms A6-7400K by 26% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-3800 291
A6-7400K 425
+46%

A6-7400K outperforms A8-3800 by 46% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-3800 894
+50.8%
A6-7400K 593

A8-3800 outperforms A6-7400K by 51% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.32 1.05
Recency 30 June 2011 31 July 2014
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm

The A8-3800 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-7400K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-3800 and A6-7400K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-3800
A8-3800
AMD A6-7400K
A6-7400K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 66 votes

Rate A8-3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 67 votes

Rate A6-7400K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-3800 or A6-7400K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.