Trace: try redirect_from
Trace: select _id, title from ss_cpu where redirect_to=712
Turion 64 X2 TL-62 vs A8-3510MX
Primary details
Comparing A8-3510MX and Turion 64 X2 TL-62 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2389 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD A-Series | 2x AMD Turion 64 |
| Architecture codename | Llano (2011−2012) | Tyler (2007−2009) |
| Release date | 14 June 2011 (13 years ago) | 13 April 2007 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A8-3510MX and Turion 64 X2 TL-62 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 218 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A8-3510MX and Turion 64 X2 TL-62 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FS1 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-3510MX and Turion 64 X2 TL-62. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6620G | 2x 512 KB Level2 Cache |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3510MX and Turion 64 X2 TL-62 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3510MX and Turion 64 X2 TL-62. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6620G | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 June 2011 | 13 April 2007 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 35 Watt |
A8-3510MX has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.
Turion 64 X2 TL-62, on the other hand, has 28.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A8-3510MX and Turion 64 X2 TL-62. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between A8-3510MX and Turion 64 X2 TL-62, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
